*By clicking the Submit button, I consent to being contacted by Altman-Nussbaum-Shunnarah Personal Injury Attorneys at the number I provided. I also consent to receiving advertisements and telemarketing messages by text message or pre-recorded call, either of which may be dialed by an autodialer. I acknowledge that my consent is not required for purchase, that standard message and data rates apply, and that clicking Submit constitutes my electronic signature for my consent to being contacted and my agreement to the Terms and Conditions.
In May 2013, Intuitive warned hospitals that a component used in its da Vinci surgical robot system may be putting patients at risk for burn injuries. According to the company’s urgent notification, some versions of the system’s Hot Shears may be prone to small cracks, potentially creating a pathway for an electro-surgical charge. Unfortunately, the cracks may not be visible. The company has already received one report of injury linked to a cracked instrument. Despite the risk, the company has elected not to recall the Hot Shears and announced that it would begin to remove the affected instruments from hospitals when a replacement becomes available.
The da Vinci surgical robot, manufactured by Intuitive Surgery, is an alternative surgical method to laparoscopic procedures and has increasingly gained popularity with hospitals since its FDA approval in 2000. The robot is designed to perform minimally invasive surgery in procedures including urologic, laparoscopic, gynecological, and non-cardio theracoscopic surgical procedures.
It is often chosen by hospitals and doctors over laparoscopic surgery due to Intuitive’s claims that the procedure is as safe as laparoscopic surgery, yet reduces recovery time in patients.
There have been no conclusive studies showing the da Vinci robot is a better or safer choice for doctors performing minimally invasive procedures – in fact, there are many signs that indicate its negative attributes outweigh its benefits. Costs of the robot significantly outweigh those of laproscopic surgeries, surgery takes longer, and recovery times have not been proven to be substantially shorter than other similar procedures. Additionally, there have been no conclusive studies that the robot is a safer or better choice than other minimally invasive procedures.
Despite the popularity of the da Vinci surgical robot, the number of complaints concerning complications stemming from the use of the device have been on the rise. Complaints against the manufacturer allege design flaws in the device including un-insulated surgical arms that cause burns, as well as electrical currents that can deviate from the intended surgical route to healthy organs and tissue, damaging them in the process. Additionally, the complaint alleged the manufacturer of failing to warn healthcare professionals and potential patients of the risks that can be involved in its use.
Unfortunately, complications from the surgery may not be evident until days after the procedure is completed, which uses up valuable time that could be used to treat the injury.
Intuitive, taking an unprompted step to mitigate the situation, sent replacement tip covers to all hospitals with the device. While the original tips were not deemed defective, the company requested the switch from the existing tips immediately to reduce the chance of sparking. However, surgeons who have observed the use of the device do not believe the tip of the robot to be a problem. Instead, their observations lead them to believe the burns stems from the scissor blade. Intuitive stands firm in their belief that the da Vinci device is no more dangerous than traditional laparoscopic devices, which they claim could cause similar issues during surgery.
Altman-Nussbaum-Shunnarah Trial Attorneys is known nationwide for providing outstanding legal advice and excellent representation. We have recovered over $750 million in lawsuits involving 18 wheeler trucking litigation, wrongful death litigation, commercial vehicle litigation, motorcycle litigation, catastrophic litigation, and mass torts involving medical devices and bad drug litigation. Our prowess in the legal arena comes from our combined years of trial and complex litigation experience.
We founded our practice on the belief that the 7th amendment and the civil jury system is the best means to provide compensation to injured parties and deter wrongdoers from injuring others in the future.
Tell us your story
"*" indicates required fields