Laparoscopic Power Morcellator Lawsuits Attorney

Altman-Nussbaum-Shunnarah Injury Lawyers is reviewing potential lawsuits involving women who received a cancer diagnosis after gynecological surgery that involved the use of Laparoscopic Power Morcellation.

Free Case Evaluation

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form

*By clicking the Submit button, I consent to being contacted by Altman-Nussbaum-Shunnarah Personal Injury Attorneys at the number I provided. I also consent to receiving advertisements and telemarketing messages by text message or pre-recorded call, either of which may be dialed by an autodialer. I acknowledge that my consent is not required for purchase, that standard message and data rates apply, and that clicking Submit constitutes my electronic signature for my consent to being contacted and my agreement to the Terms and Conditions.

A close-up view of a medical team in a dimly lit operating room performing a laparoscopic procedure on a patient's abdomen using specialized surgical instruments.

What is Laparoscopic Power Morcellation?

Surgeons began using LPMs in the mid-1990s as an alternative to more invasive procedures used to remove uterine fibroids during either a myomectomy or a hysterectomy. An LPM procedure involves the use of a thin, lighted tube equipped with a camera called a laparoscope, and a power morcellator, which uses a small blade inside of a hollow cylinder to fragment and remove tissue through the tube.

Increased Risk of Cancer

On Nov. 24, 2014, the FDA updated its safety communication regarding the laparoscopic power morcellation procedure. The statement discourages the use of power morcellators due to an increased risk to women with uterine fibroids, and recommends that a new boxed warning be included in all product labeling to inform health care providers and patients that “Uterine tissue may contain unsuspected cancer. The use of laparoscopic power morcellators during fibroid surgery may spread cancer and decrease the long-term survival of patients. This information should be shared with patients when considering surgery with the use of these devices.”

The safety alert also includes two contraindications—or situations in which the LPM procedure should not be used—that comprises the majority of women undergoing surgery for uterine fibroids.

Hysterectomy Statistics

A special report released by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) in May 2014 estimates that, of the approximately 600,000 hysterectomies done in the U.S. each year:

  • less than 30 percent are performed laparoscopically in women younger than 40
  • less than 44 percent in women ages 40 to 49, and;
  • 16 percent in women ages 50 to 59.

It adds that “the most common indication for hysterectomy is uterine leiomyomas [uterine fibroids], accounting for an estimated 40% of hysterectomies.”

Altman-Nussbaum-Shunnarah Injury Lawyers is reviewing potential lawsuits involving women who received a cancer diagnosis after gynecological surgery that involved the use of Laparoscopic Power Morcellation.

If you or someone you know has been diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma cancer (cancerous uterine fibroids), a gynecologic cancer, uncontrolled growth of fibroids in the abdominal area or other parts of the body, or an occult malignancy (a cancer from an unknown source) following a gynecological surgery that used laparoscopic power morcellation, you may have a claim. Call Altman-Nussbaum-Shunnarah Personal Injury Attorneys today at 1-800-229-7989.

Alexander Shunnarah Trial Attorneys logo

Altman-Nussbaum-Shunnarah Trial Attorneys is known nationwide for providing outstanding legal advice and excellent representation. We have recovered over $750 million in lawsuits involving 18 wheeler trucking litigation, wrongful death litigation, commercial vehicle litigation, motorcycle litigation, catastrophic litigation, and mass torts involving medical devices and bad drug litigation. Our prowess in the legal arena comes from our combined years of trial and complex litigation experience.

We founded our practice on the belief that the 7th amendment and the civil jury system is the best means to provide compensation to injured parties and deter wrongdoers from injuring others in the future.

Voted About Town best attorney award badge for 2019 and 2020
b metro best attorney award badge for years 2017 to 2020
The National Trial Lawyers top 100 award badge with scales of justice icon
Award badge for top 40 under 40 trial lawyers with scales of justice icon
Trucking top 10 trial lawyers award badge with scales of justice icon
Best Lawyers award logo with blue and red branding
Super Lawyers 2019 rating badge for attorney recognition
A square award graphic divided into two sections. The top half is black with the white text "500 LEADING PLAINTIFF CONSUMER LAWYERS." The bottom half is a metallic gold gradient with the black text "LAWDRAGON 2020" underlined.
Nation’s premier NAOPIA top ten attorney 2021 award badge with scales of justice icon
AV peer review rated badge by LexisNexis Martindale Hubbell for ethical standards and legal ability
Translate »
Woman wearing red glasses with overlay text “we go to war for your family” representing personal injury legal support

Tell us your story

Woman wearing red glasses with overlay text “we go to war for your family” representing personal injury legal support